Creating a better future
Last week, Woolworths announced its Sustainable Fish Sourcing Strategy. You can read the details on their site, but in short they plan to introduce MSC certified canned tuna and salmon, and remove red-listed species from their fresh fish range. Woolworths should be applauded for taking this major step forward. Seafood is one of those areas where most consumers simply aren't equipped to make sustainable decisions on their own, and retailers certainly play a role. Let's hope their competitors rise to the challenge and match the Woolworths offering.
The role of retailers in the trend towards sustainable and ethical consumption is both critical and vital. Expecting consumers to be sufficiently educated, informed and motivated to read and interpret labels in order to make informed decisions is simply not realistic. And in the case of most fresh food, labeling generally only extends as far as country of origin. Sustainable sourcing policies that simply remove unsustainable products from the shelves has to be the way to go. It sends a clear signal up the supply chain that unsustainable or unethical pracitces simply aren't going to be tolerated.
For some time in Australia, many towns and suburbs have boasted organic greengrocers. What I find more exciting is main stream retailers, large and small, simply saying no to unsustainable products. One example is my local neighborhood butcher. He only stocks free range chicken and pork products. It is not something he makes a big song and dance about, nor does he charge a premium cost. His customers simply know that they don't have to ask where the bacon came from, it will be free range.
So what trends have you noticed, and for which products do you wish to see retailers adopt more sustainable sourcing strategies?
Add a Comment
Comment by saugato mukerji on April 2, 2011 at 6:40pm
Comment by Leon Young on March 28, 2011 at 12:22pm That's an interesting point Saugato, but wouldn't you agree there are many other issues to be considered apart from water? Issues that need to be considered with fish farming, that I am aware of, include the source of the fish food (usually fish meal and fish oil...but where does that come from?), pollution of the surrounding environment from the farm, transportation (this issue is the same as for wild catch), and I am sure there are more. Which is not to say fish farming can't be an important part of the solution, I am sure it is, but selecting a sustainable fish product is still a complex issue and while there are a couple of guides out there, at the moment they don't list specific fisheries but rather provide very generalised, non-specific guidance.
However, here is more proof things are moving in the right direction: http://www.msc.org/newsroom/news/australia2019s-sustainable-seafood...
Comment by saugato mukerji on March 28, 2011 at 12:03am Farmed fish is the most sustainable water efficient source of protein. It takes 16000 litres of water to grow 1kg of beef. In case of fish the water use is mainly limited to the evaporated water loss the equivalent water use in the order of 10s of litres of water per kg of protein equivalent to beef. Additionally the fish protein is healthier than beef in terms of cholesterol.
Supermarket chains could take significant action for the sustainability cause by promoting and evangelising the consumption of farmed fish from coastal fish farms and inland pond / tank fishery enterprises.
Infinite Energy posted a blog post
© 2012 Created by Change2.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Change2 to add comments!
Join Change2